Change Management

When selecting an IRT provider, be sure to ask how quickly data changes and system modifications can be accomplished, both at study start and as the trial proceeds. Veracity Logic’s approach reduces costs, empowers users, maintains quality standards, and shortens both the time and the paperwork involved with managing change. Our robust Issue Tracking System captures all user concerns and requests for change throughout the study…and provides an easy way to ensure all requirements are addressed in a timely manner.

Selecting a Fast, Adaptable IRT is one Key to Success

Can Your IRT System React to Surprise Protocol Changes?  If you’re on a dark ocean and spot an iceberg ahead, do you really want to be on board the Titanic? Clinical trials have hidden challenges that surprise sponsors and vendors alike. So using a vendor that reacts quickly is critical to saving time and costs for sponsors. […]

Posted in Case Studies, IRT Essentials | Tagged | Leave a comment

Five IRT Assists for Clinical Project Managers

Challenge: You’re a Clinical Project Manager (CPM) given a study halfway through enrollment and you need to get up to speed on study status FAST!  How can your IRT help? Solution: Fortunately, you’re using Veracity Logic’s Interactive Response Technology system, VLIRT®.  Here are five key features geared toward CPMs who find themselves in just this predicament. […]

Posted in Case Studies | Tagged | Leave a comment

User Power: Managing Cohorts

 The Problem: The management of multiple cohorts is a standard offering of most IRTs. In the common sequential model, when Cohort 1 reaches  a pre-designated limit the cohort is closed by the system and subjects can no longer be enrolled into that cohort. Problem: The design of your study is such that the maximum number of subjects in each of your […]

Posted in Case Studies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Handling Data Corrections…

Problem: There are many options for processing manual data changes in an IRT system. Some vendors make all data changes for the clinical site users. Others have electronic systems where users can request and approve changes, while still others require ‘wet’ signatures. What’s the best option for achieving the two key goals of change control, i.e., documenting […]

Posted in Case Studies | Tagged | Leave a comment

We’re midway through the study and the protocol has changed…but only for some sites. Arghh…!

Problem: The IRT was originally configured to accept eligible subjects with a maximum age of 75.  Midway through the trial, the maximum age was increased to 80…but only for sites whose IRBs had approved the increased age!  What to do? Solution: Veracity Logic configures a flag on the  IRT Site Information page that allows Clinical Project Managers to […]

Posted in Case Studies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Can Your IRT System React to Surprise Protocol Changes?

If you’re on a dark ocean and spot an iceberg ahead, do you really want to be on board the Titanic? Clinical trials have hidden challenges that surprise sponsors and vendors alike. So using a vendor that reacts quickly is critical to saving time and costs for sponsors. Large companies are typically unable to quickly steer […]

Posted in Newsletters | Tagged | Leave a comment